ADMIN05: aka "Admindoors"

.....[Written the first week of April] I mentioned in a correspondence to someone in comics retail recently that this has been the worst April Fools' joke ever. I pointed out to him that I had also walked about a mile the morning after the 1997 blizzard, so there's your context.

.....If you're reading this in later years, I'm referring to the COVID-19 epidemic that has made it prudent for businesses involving high personal traffic to close in order to help stop the virus from spreading. That includes the largest comics distributor in the U.S., Diamond, which has chosen the first of April to be the first week in decades that it has shut down normal operations. They'll still restock stores with back catalog trade books, although I don't know where stores will still be open to the public. Savvy retailers are offering to ship merchandise to customers, but without new titles it's going to hard to maintain interest. So, we're at the point where I remember that I have a blog I can dust off and where you're bored enough to read it. The best place to start would be with an item I had been preparing for a post last year when a family issue took precedence.

.....[Flash forward a month] There still hasn't been any announcement from Diamond about resuming distribution, although their website has bizarrely continued to issue shipping updates every week. This must be someone perfunctorily passing on information from publishers. Ordinarily a retailer's decisions to order, reorder or cancel are informed by date changes (in theory), so rather than take the time to parse out whether or not the unprecedented shipless month makes that information irrelevant it would be quicker, easier and cheaper to just key in a page of information once a week and post it.

.....Speaking of keying in a page of information once a week and posting it...
.....The first two paragraphs were meant to introduce a new post, #68, which involved more than transposing memos to the screen but should never have taken a month to complete. Every time I sat down I wondered how the entry would read years from now when someone finds it through a term search for the post's topic. I've been fortunate enough that I've yet to hear about anyone I knew personally dying in the epidemic. I doubt that it would change the cavalier tone used above; it's my default writing voice, as well as a mechanism for functioning through grief. I'm less certain that the hypothetical reader will be so served by it. Yet, I wasn't certain that scrapping it and not mentioning the biggest elephant in comics' room at the moment was best either. The answer I should have come up with at the time was to split them into two posts, this being the first. It's always obvious in retrospect.

.....In post #68 it's back to the ephemera in my collection, and by way of a hint I'll just say that I hope the post results in high numbers.

0067: Looks Like The Mole Rat Really WILL Be CGI

Kudos to anyone who remembers the episode of "Kim Possible" that inspired this post's title (extra brownie points if you knew that Joe Montegna was a guest voice actor in that episode).

About a month ago I saw a trailer for a live action Kim Possible movie debuting February 15, 2019 and I knew what the next post would be:

The reason you're seeing the back of the inlay card for this soundtrack album is because it's a promotional copy that I picked up at a used CD store for $1 (hence the neatly die-cut hole in the barcode-- if this had been a deleted or clearance copy there would have been a drilled hole or sawed notch somewhere, but the jewel case was intact except for the inevitable superficial scratches). The downside was that there was no booklet in the promo copy (they mean nothing at radio stations), but, hey, for a buck? I really didn't need pictures of Rufus and Drakken or whatever was in there and I certainly wasn't looking for lyrics to sing along with whatever random boy bands Disney partially owned at the time, plus Smashmouth. In fact, a few years after this came out there was a "new and Kim-proved" version that added a couple of musical numbers that actually appeared in the show and dropped some other songs such as the one by 'Brassy' (?) which was actually already a three year old A-side when this version came out. Although there was no booklet, the CD surface had graphics instead of generic typeface (as promos sometimes have), so I'm guessing that this is what the regular stock copies looked like:

For the record, the CD-ROM feature still produces a menu whose links include registering for a newsletter and accessing internet features (both of which are defunct), plus "help" (didn't bother) and "exit" (works like a dream).

I'm not sure if the target audience for the new movie knows Kim at all. It's possible if Disney has offered the old series on a streaming service. Just to be safe Disney has been showing a small block of episodes in an early morning slot, presumably for kids who watch TV while eating breakfast before leaving for school? We'll know how well it does this Halloween if there are more little Mabels from "Gravity Falls" or Webbys from "Duck Tales" running around with grappling guns because they couldn't find small sized black turtlenecks and cargo pants in 2019. I don't have lofty expectations. For one thing, because Disney owns ABC and actors under contract, especially kids, go back and forth between the channels, they've cast the youngest kid from "The Goldbergs" as Ron Stoppable. As much as I love Jeff Garland (look for his appearances with Craig Ferguson on YouTube), that show is excruciating. Playing Ron requires a huge range for a cartoon character. You'd have to go from breezy unearned confidence to screaming ninny in the blink of an eye and then back again. It's the "back again" part I'm worried about. Kim can be pretty subtle, too. I don't recognize the actress cast as Kim but that might be because I don't normally watch Disney's live cast shows. I just hope they don't screw up the extensive supporting cast too badly.

0066: He's The Utmost-- And The Most Ut!

I know it's been ages since I posted, and largely it's because I've been trying to update my have/want lists for comics. Numerous titles have been published since the last time I wrote out my booklet and integrating the titles alphabetically  seems like a lot of work, but ultimately not as much as flipping through a dog eared notebook trying to find titles randomly shoe-horned in after the fact on whatever page once had blank space relatively close to where they should go. But also because I'm lazy.

I've also been futzing with some new tech I've never needed to use before-- a camera. Specifically the one built into my laptop. So far, most of the items I've been profiling here have been objects flat enough to be captured by a scanner, or the packaging of those things that weren't. And since the purpose of the blog is to take account and/or stock of the items in my collection related to comics without actually being comics (or at least conventional comics- I've done a number of promo and PSA type stuff), I began repeatedly running up against three-dimensional items that I couldn't represent without swiping an image from online, something that I wanted  to avoid or minimize. For the record, on the few occasions that I do use an outside source (such as one of the several images I'll include today), I clearly describe it as such and provide readers with the source.

When the time came to test my editing skills, I didn't have to think twice about it. It had to be the guy who probably wouldn't even think once about it. He's that indefatigable man of action, bon vivant and malaprop, none other than Bob Burden's The Flaming Carrot!

 

This is an action figure made available by Dark Horse in 1999. It's being offered on eBay at the moment for $25-$35 and on Amazon for (I kid you not) $79.99 with the disclaimer that it "comes mint on the card but the bubble has been slit." Do you know what the professional term for that is? It's called "NOT mint on the card". A better way to phrase that might be, "figure and accessories in perfect condition, packaging compromised". That would put your best foot and not sound as though you're trying to misrepresent the item.

On a whim I went to the Dark Horse website (where I got the image below of the original package intact) and found that they are still offering it for $11.95. I don't know how many, if any, are left 20 years later, but you can check it out for yourself at: this page on the Dark Horse site.

This is the outside image I mentioned in the second paragraph.

You can't quite read all of the blurbs through the accessories, but I still have the original packaging myself, so I'll save you the eyestrain:

• "Works upside-down!"
• "Head lights up!" (this is true, keep reading)
• "Use only as directed!"
• "Real fake flaming action!"
• "World's first surrealistic superhero!"

The accessories are (on the left) his Nuclear-powered Pogo Stick and (on the right) his 9mm Radom automatic [this is way out of my wheelhouse, but it kind of looks like the Vis model and yes, unlike the pogo stick that is an actual Polish designed handgun] and two stink bombs. I've seen websites that have erroneously identified the stink bombs as grenades and the pogo stick as a grappling device, but all of the accessories appear in the "Secrets Of The Carrot!" pin-up from FLAMING CARROT COMICS ANNUAL #1 (01/97) and several places since, including two different trades. They're all clearly marked and described.

The back of the package was too big for my scanner, so I broke the image into sections.

The comics portion in the middle has a history. All of the panels were originally published in B&W and I suspect that this was their color debut. The first panel was drawn for the inside front cover of FLAMING CARROT COMICS #24 (04/90), seen below:

In this early version of the page, the other six panels come from a feature in issue #3 (03/84), published by Aardvark-Vanaheim before Dark Horse existed. Entitled "Flaming Carrot And His World" it consists of a full page splash and four pages that each have two large panels, one on top of the other.

In this B&W original, panels 2-3 made up page 2 of the 1984 story. Panels 4-5, in reverse order, made up page 3 of the story and panels 6-7, in that order, made up page 5. The splash and page 4 weren't used.

The color version obviously took only the panels from pages 2 and 5 from issue #3 and the introduction panel made for issue #24.

You can also find the whole B&W page in the third Dark Horse trade, "GREATEST HITS", even though the three trades are devoted to reprinting the pre-DH issues published by A-V and Renegade (1984-1987).

The action figure itself is pretty neat and although I don't really play with the figures I've bought since childhood I have posed the figure on various bookshelves and can attest to it having a certain degree of durability. It has 14 points of articulation, as follows:

1. (pivot) neck
2. (pivot) left shoulder
3. (hinge) left elbow
4. (pivot) left wrist
5. (pivot) right shoulder
6. (hinge) right elbow
7. (pivot) right wrist
8. (pivot) waist
9. (pivot) left hip
10. (hinge) left knee
11. (pivot) left ankle
12. (pivot) right hip
13. (hinge) right knee
14. (pivot) right ankle

That's not including the battery operated red light "flame", activated by twisting the clear plastic flame on top of his carrot mask/head. The battery still works; it's obviously not an alkaline battery since it hasn't leaked acid after all this time. My first attempt at getting a photo of the "lit" flame showed the limitations of the camera at lower fidelity settings:

I can get a sharper picture, but it reduces the overall effect:

Last but not least, no job is finished until the paperwork is done:

Should anyone come across a used, loose copy of the figure, you may want to consult this to replace the battery, because it's a really cool effect in person.

Well, now that I can post about solid objects, I'm not going to write off flat objects completely. But I am going to take advantage of this more often and try to think out of the box. Or at least think out of the blister pack.

0065: No More Hanging Around

I know it's been awhile since this blog had a genuine entry, but unlike Spider-man (below) I haven't just been hanging around. My computer finally crapped out on me after years of service. Well, after wrestling with the software of a new computer (a brand new model which wouldn't accept scans from my copier but had factory default settings for sending and receiving faxes?!?), I thought that the first item I would use to catch up with would be this comic book themed birthday card.

Front

Back

Fitting for comics, the interior is more of a visual gag than a message:

Bringing these visuals to readers used involve scanning from a copier to my PC, editing and saving the images with easily organized labels and then extracting images from that set of scans while composing these posts. Pretty much three phases involving almost as few steps. It's now about five or six phases and I'm not certain what I'll need to do to streamline the process. The good news is that it might be easier to create photos for solid objects in addition to flat surface scans. Cross your fingers.

ADMIN04 A few notes on the death of Tom Wolfe

If the recent Royal Wedding and school shooting haven't driven you from news coverage, you may have heard that Tom Wolfe died last week (May 14), but it's worth noting here because of the unusual footnote he became in comics history.

Just when Marvel was going through a renaissance with the introduction of The Fantastic Four and subsequent stable of new characters, Wolfe was establishing himself as a journalist and Andy Warhol was gaining national attention for his ideas about how images work on the collective consciousness of a culture. While Roy Lichtenstein famously stole art from panels of comic books to pretend that they were his own ironic commentary, Warhol's paintings of known pop culture figures such as Popeye were about the shared experiences of the viewers. When he revealed his series of soup can paintings in the summer of 1962, Marvel introduced Thor, Ant-Man and Spider-Man, as well as Dr. Doom. In just the few previous years, Wolfe had moved from a newspaper in Springfield, Massachusetts to writing for the New York Herald Tribune. By the end of 1962, three things happened to change each of their lives. Marvel's problems with introducing super-hero titles [ see The Post Anniversary ] went away; a gallery owner suggested that Warhol make art using serious subjects, resulting in his "Death and Disaster" series; and a newspaper strike in New York began (lasting until the end of March 1963), prompting Wolfe to seek freelance work for magazines, specifically Esquire.

To give some frame of reference for how these things were significant, let's start with Marvel. From the summer of 1957 on, their situation required them to cancel one title in order to introduce another onto the racks. In 1960, they cancelled two in order to revive two others cancelled in 1957. They also began playing with the frequency of publishing some titles and in 1961 cancelled two but added three new ones, including "Fantastic Four". In 1962, one was cancelled to introduce "The Hulk" and another was cancelled to bring back "Two-Gun Kid". During those three years, of the four new titles and three revivals only "Fantastic Four" and two revived westerns were still published by the end of 1963. Contrast that to the one year period beginning in December 1962. With four cancellations and four new titles, one of them, "Sgt. Fury and His Howling Commandos", lasted until 1981 and "Amazing Spider-man", "Avengers" and "X-Men" continued (with interruptions and re-numberings) into the present. That's a greatly improved track record, which continued when "Daredevil" was introduced the following year and soon all of their super-hero titles were being published monthly.

Warhol acquired his first Factory workspace in 1962 and in 1963 had it redone in silver and reflective surfaces, making it a notorious hangout for scenesters and creating a network that discussed his work in influential circles. His "Death and Disaster" images were mentioned everywhere, so that when the President was assassinated in November the series made Warhol seem eerily prescient. People who may have previously been amused or charmed by his work in the past would later actively seek to know what he'd work on next.

Tom Wolfe's work for Esquire took on a casual approach he wouldn't have used for newspaper journalism, and when its editor published a personal communication from Wolfe in the place of an article in late 1963, Esquire's readership could read Wolfe almost without a filter for the first time. The title of that letter-turned-magazine-piece was, believe it or not, "There goes (VAROOM! VAROOM!) that Kandy Kolored (THPHHHHHH!) tangerine-flake streamline baby (RAHGHHHH!) around the bend (BRUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM......" The article he was supposed to be submitting at the time was meant to be about customizing cars and amateur racing enthusiasts. That explains the reference to "tangerine-flake"-- metal flake paint was not only sparkly and attention grabbing but at the time it was difficult to apply by spraying (technological advances since then have made it easier), so it was a sign among aficionados of a gear head willing to make the extra effort to carefully apply the temperamental substance by hand. Unfortunately for Wolfe and the Esquire editor, the November 1963 article came in the wake of Timothy Leary (and Richard Alpert) being dismissed from Harvard over their experimentation with LSD earlier that year. As information about the new substance gradually reached the general public through commercial mass media that didn't have the firmest understanding of psychopharmacology, there was a lot of talk about citrus and sugar cubes that left the average Joe Lunchpail thinking that anything colorful and sweet and therefore likely to appeal to children might be hiding a chemical that will melt their brains. Now go back and read that title again. You can begin to see how Tom Wolfe was going to be cast against type as the decade wore on.

Doctor Strange #180 (05/69), page 10

In the article itself, Wolfe profiled (and no doubt introduced to much of Esquire's readership) cartoonist Big Daddy Roth, whose Rat Fink character and others would appear in paid ads in comics during the 60's, and George Barris, who created the Batmobile for television a few years later.
It was collected with 20 other essays into the book "The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby", published in 1965. The notoriety fueled a demand for more work written in its more personal "New Journalism" style and in less than two years he had written the pieces that would be compiled as "The Pump House Gang"(1968).

Perhaps giving in to the inevitable, he went on the road with Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters to document their antics and speculate on their motives, resulting in the book "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" (also 1968, same day in fact-- August 20).

Doctor Strange #180 (05/69), page 11

Both books came out about a month after the U.S. release of the Pink Floyd album "Saucerful Of Secrets" (July 23rd; June 28th in the U.K.) featuring Doctor Strange (and the Living Tribunal) on the cover using art from Strange Tales #158 (07/67). As of the spring of 1968, Strange Tales stopped devoting half its pages to S.H.I.E.L.D. stories when Nick Fury & company moved to their own new series and the old title was renamed after Doctor Strange. Roy Thomas was writing the series and had just completed a Dormammu story (#171-173) that returned Clea to the cast when the Floyd album came out in the U.S. That means that the next story, a multi-parter involving Asmodeus and the Sons Of Satannish (#174-178 and Avengers #61) had already been plotted and the first issue printed when Wolfe's two books were released. The next issue after that would be #179, due to ship in January with an April cover date if the series continued publishing monthly on time. Thomas had a lot on his plate in the late 60's and I'm not sure how far in advance his scripts were written, but the lead couldn't have been too long, since Marvel then seemed much more of the moment than DC, whose idea of counter culture figures at the time was more like beatniks from an episode of "Ozzie and Harriet" or "Dobie Gillis" (whose comics they published). In August of 1968, Warhol revealed his first works since being shot in June. One was a portrait of Happy Rockefeller, the wife of then-Governor of New York Nelson Rockefeller. Aside from the unnatural pink color scheme, there didn't seem to be anything ironic or metaphoric about the image at all. In every other sense it was a straightforward portrait of someone who didn't hold any office nor was known for any particular works-- she was famous for being famous, the kind of celebrity Warhol had and would always find fascinating. It was a glimpse into a direction Warhol's work would take in the next decade. Instead of familiar objects and icons or the manufactured celebrity of his Factory denizens, he would reproduce and alter the images of existing celebrities by the score. When Roy Thomas read passages in "Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" describing Kesey and his cohorts reading Marvel comics on their bus, he knew he wanted to capitalize on being mentioned in a best selling book, regardless of the context. At any other time he might have given a cameo to the Pranksters (or some fictional proxy group created for that purpose) but the more innovative and up to the minute idea was that of the journalist as participant/celebrity. For the next story, Thomas worked Tom Wolfe himself into the script. It wasn't so far fetched; Wolfe lived and worked in New York, as did Doctor Strange. The two pages above show the extent of his cameo, with Strange mentioning to Clea that he hadn't seen Wolfe since 1964, which sent me scrambling through the first two years of "Strange Tales" to see if Doc interacted with anyone named "Tom", "Mr. Wolfe" or even a newspaper reporter, any disposable background character that Roy Thomas could slyly  imply had been Wolfe all along. I also checked out Doc's guest appearances that year in Fantastic Four #27, Journey Into Mystery #108 and a cameo in the first Spider-Man annual. I could have saved myself some time by reading the introduction Thomas wrote for Marvel Masterworks: Doctor Strange Vol. 4 (12/09).

Did you catch that? Thomas confused Wolfe's first book of essays, "The Kandy-Kolored...", with his book on Kesey, "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test". That's probably, as I had suggested above, because in the context of the time in which it came out its title subliminally suggested a connection to LSD and therefore to Doc (by virtue of the psychedelic LP jacket).

By the time the Asmodeus story had played itself out, the sales of "Nick Fury, Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D." and "Doctor Strange" were starting to dwindle. The New Year's Eve story planned for #179 was replaced by a reprint and instead ran in #180, released in February with a May cover date, as was S.H.I.E.L.D. #12. Both titles would get used to skipping a month from that point on. Marvel's other two-feature anthologies, "Tales Of Suspense" and "Tales To Astonish", had each been successfully split into two separate titles but "Strange Tales" hadn't been so lucky. With a price increase looming, a decision was made to reduce each title to bi-monthly status rather than cancel them immediately. The next issue of each came out in April with a July cover date, mere weeks before both Marvel and DC raised their cover prices to 15¢. Each lasted two more issues.

Incredible Hulk #142 (08/71), page 10

A year later, in the spring of 1970, New York Magazine published Tom Wolfe's article "Radical Chic", which by the end of the year was combined with a second piece as the book "Radical Chic & Mau-Mauing The Flak Catchers". The focus of "Radical Chic" was that after a decade of social problems previously hidden being exposed and targeted both by government and grass roots organizations, Wolfe believed he was witnessing a wealthy leisure class affecting postures of the radical left, not because they had any understanding of or empathy for their causes, but because they found the drama entertaining.

Roy Thomas had taken over scripting "Incredible Hulk" as "Doctor Strange" was winding down. He was still writing it two years later and apparently saw it as the perfect vehicle for a second nod to Wolfe. After all, the one situation the Hulk hadn't yet been in was having a group of socialites making a pet cause out of him. The single issue story from #142 involves a couple named Reggie and Malicia Parrington who throw a fund-raiser for the Hulk's legal defense (which--spoiler-- he completely fails to grasp) in order to one-up Leonard Bernstein's support for the Black Panthers the previous year, which was the basis for Wolfe's article. Their daughter Samantha hates the fact that her parents ignore serious issues impacting more people, such as women's rights, and leaves the party. Meanwhile, the Enchantress (prevented by Odin from leaving Asgard) sees this as an opportunity to get revenge on the Hulk (for issue #101) and imbues Samantha with the identity of a Valkyrie she had previously stolen as a disguise to attack the Avengers [in Avengers #83(12/70), also written by Roy Thomas].
There's several contemporary references going on here. Let's start with the first panel. The stage play "The Effect Of Gamma Rays On Man In The Moon Marigolds" was already five years old when it came to New York (off Broadway) in 1970, but won the 1971 Pulitzer for Drama (probably announced in April when this story should have been already scripted). I'm not sure who "Harold" is supposed to be, but Paul Newman produced and directed the film version, which came out at the end of 1972. Without the Hulk, by the way. The mention of "I Am Furious (Green)" is obviously a take on "I Am Curious (Yellow)"(1967) and lesser known companion film "I Am Curious (Blue)"(1968) by Swedish director Vilgot Sjöman. It wasn't even the most outrageous abuse of the title; that would be Superman's Girlfriend Lois Lane #106 (11/70) with its own radical chic cover story, "I Am Curious (Black)", in which Kryptonian technology turns Lois black for a day or so.

Incredible Hulk #142 (08/71), page 16

The second panel shows someone looking to benefit the X-Men "if I can find them". This refers to the fact that Roy Thomas returned to writing the X-Men for it's final year of new stories. The last one, #66 (03/70), guest-starred the Hulk. Marvel wanted to cancel the title. Thomas convinced the owners to remove the X-Men reprints from "Marvel Super-Heroes" (which they shared with Daredevil reprints) and replace them with Iron Man reprints from "Tales Of Suspense" and return to publishing X-Men as a reprint book with #67 (12/70). Thomas would eventually bring back the team as guest stars in various titles he either wrote or edited beginning in 1972. Finally,  Wolfe himself appears in panels 3 and 5.
Wolfe comes back a few pages later after the Enchantress has transformed Samantha and compels her to return to the party to attack the Hulk.
The Valkyrie persona was used once more by the Enchantress in an early Defenders issue, #4 (02/73), this time written by Steve Englehart but edited by Thomas. In that case, the Valkyrie identity completely overwrote that of a woman named Barbara Norris who had been driven insane by one of Doctor Strange's enemies. The Defenders objected, since Norris was unable to consent to the transformation and much of the next ten years of the series was spent trying to reconcile the new Valkyrie character's split identity. Parrington was brought back as the Valkyrie for a 12-issue Defenders series in 2001 and was joined by her parents for the sequel "The Order" in 2002.
Tom Wolfe, however, would only revisit Marvel as a trivia question or in a veiled allusion from mischievous writers to nostalgic fans. Of course, I haven't bothered to reread 40 years of letters pages to see if he wrote in to them. Tell you what; if you find such a letter, let me know in the comments.

0064: The Jigsaw's Up #1

The reason, I suspect, that there isn't a comprehensive database for licensed products featuring popular comic book characters is that one of the cardinal organizing principles would be the art credits and there is often no record of who drew what.

It's true that there's an enormous volume of individual pieces to track, but that's also true of comics themselves and there are and have long been checklists and price guides of every comic from a given publisher, big and small, either in print or online. These often include art and/or writing credits, but for some users that might not be necessary if their only interest is in a particular character or genre. With licensed products, however, there is no story, per se, although one might be implied. What you get is a character (or  several) in a pose or scenario either lifted from a previously released publication or newly drawn to meet the standards of whoever the publisher's Art Director is at the time. For licensed super-heroes, the thinking for decades was that they were most appropriate for products intended for a market of children. For that reason, fan favorite artists who appealed to those readers who bought and read the largest number of comics, most frequently and consistently, were passed over in favor of artists inclined to give the characters an even softer and friendlier look than they would ordinarily have. Who were these artists? Good question. When the art is reproduced from a print publication it's usually easy (if time consuming) to verify the artist. Original art and exclusive images, which should be more desirable, are ironically more difficult to tie to an artist. License holders don't want to field questions about artists they've never directly employed or even met, so they prefer the work not be signed. So, it becomes a detective game of educated guesses and shots in the dark.

Let's take the Incredible Hulk jigsaw puzzle, whose box lid is pictured above, as a case study. It is clearly a children's product, starting with the fact that it is a 100-piece puzzle [technically 108 pieces]. The same manufacturer, Rainbow Works, also makes 500- and 1000-piece boxed jigsaw puzzles of more conventional landscapes and flower arrangements. Secondly, the normally scowling Hulk merely has a furrowed brow and the kids in the school bus window, far from panicking about being in the grip of a giant green monster, seem happy to see him.

Next, check out the side panel above. There are two copyright dates, 1981 and 1988. The finished product should have the later date, but the earlier date invites two possible explanations. Either this same puzzle was released in 1981 and this is a reissue of the same puzzle in a new package; or the artwork was taken from some other product or book originally published in 1981 and used again to make this jigsaw puzzle in 1988. So we're probably looking for someone Marvel would ask to draw a no frills Hulk picture circa 1981.

For Marvel, 1981 was a freaky little year. In the two years since cancelling roughly two dozen titles at the beginning of 1979 around the time of a price increase (to 40¢), Marvel had ended its relationship with Simon & Schuster, whose Fireside imprint published paperbacks reprinting Marvel comics stories (mostly Silver Age) from 1974 to 1979. However, they also published an exercise book, a cook book, "How To Draw Comics The Marvel Way" and several books of puzzles, all of which licensed images of Marvel characters. The puzzle books must have proved popular enough to justify the new series FUN AND GAMES #1 (09/79)- #13 (09/80), a newsstand comic book filled with similar puzzles using art often credited to Owen McCarron. McCarron was a Canadian cartoonist who was a fixture of Canadian newspapers for decades, but also did sporadic work for Marvel in addition to the FUN AND GAMES series. In light of his familiarity with the characters and the disappearance of outlets for his art like the Fireside trades and the subsequent comic book series, it makes sense that Marvel would turn to McCarron for licensing images in 1981. There are other candidates, of course, many of whom will remain forever anonymous, but this art is very much in his style. His take on the Hulk follows the look that John Romita, Sr. (who was Marvel's Art Director during most if not all of McCarron's projects with Marvel) approved for licensed products in the late 70's.

If we're willing to assume that McCarron is the artist, that still doesn't explain why the image was copyrighted for 1981. It's worth pointing out that the date doesn't refer to the design of the logo, which is itself a form of intellectual property. The "Incredible Hulk" comic book series used a 'stone block' motif for its logo from the time it took over the "Tales To Astonish" title as of #102 (04/68) through #128 (06/70), except for #109 (11/68). #109 had a stylized logo the was later tidied up and used as the regular logo for #129 (07/70)- #313 (11/85) and is the one that appears on the jigsaw puzzle box. I should note that it was only used on the monthly series. The Annuals used the 'stone block' style logo from 1969 to 1994 (with three exceptions I'll explain in a moment) for some reason. It was also used for the single Giant-Size Hulk (1975) and Marvel Treasury Editions #5 (1975) and #17 (1978). His remaining three solo volumes of MTE (#20, 24 and 26) used a "Rampaging Hulk" logo similar to the one often used on the B&W magazine. Even the reprint series "Marvel Super-Heroes" used the 'stone block' logo from #56 (03/76) until its cancellation with #105 (01/82), The only Annuals not using the 'stone block' style were the first (1968), with its unique (and notorious) logo integrated into the art by Jim Steranko, and #14 (1985)- #15 (1986), which had the same logo used on the monthly series for #314 (12/85)- 339 (01/88). Oddly, shortly before the jigsaw puzzle was marketed the monthly series reverted to the 'stone block' logo and kept it for the rest of the run of that incarnation of the title, except for a handful of issues that temporarily adopted the 1962 logo for nostalgia purposes. There's no reason to think that the logo, if it also accompanied the art in 1981, would have been copyrighted for that year specifically after being in continuous use for a decade. I'm also curious as to why they might use that particular logo on the jigsaw puzzle box in 1988 when the comics had not only discontinued its use but had used two other logos since then. It's not actually part of the art used to make the puzzle; it only appears on the packaging.

The next step to finding a possible source for the art was to research other products from the manufacturer. Rainbow Works gave the puzzle a product number: 75913-2. One thing I found about their products is that the '2' that comes after the dash isn't an ordinary UPC suffix. Some of their products have two-digit numbers after the five-digit index. The other thing I found is that products of theirs in the 75900 series of indices have copyrights ranging from 1968 to 1992 but that the numerical order of the indices is unrelated to the chronological order of the products. Also, several indices have more than one suffix, indicating different products. But most importantly, most of those products were framed tray jigsaw puzzles. Those are sold assembled with the outermost edge of the image uncut and glued against a heavy cardboard backing and the interior pieces loose. It wouldn't surprise me if the Hulk image had been used for a framed tray puzzle in 1981 and revived in 1988 for a boxed puzzle to sell it through different channels. I'd rather know for certain. The image may have been made for a Whitman/Western coloring book or some other child-targeted product.

If any readers own or know of an earlier use of the above image, please leave a note to that effect in the comments. Even a later use would be interesting, and possibly provide a lead to earlier licensees.

0063: Pay As You Glow

The comic scan on the right is from a 1974 promotional comic printed by Custom Comics, Inc. There is no indicia per se, just that date, name and the address "10 W.19th St., N.Y.C." on the bottom of the second page. There's also no cover in the sense of a slick paper outer cover carrying trade dress such as a publisher name, price, date, distributor's mark,  etc. The yellow strip at the bottom does indicate the region where it was intended to be given away; the same cover (and I have to guess the same interior) was used for Pennsylvania and Southern California.

"Massachusetts Electric" is self explanatory. For those of you outside New England, "Granite State" refers to New Hampshire and Narragansett is in Rhode Island. The same title was used for promotional comics with different covers, albeit with the same nuclear family. [That both is and isn't a pun, so I'm now wondering if it would have made a better title for the post.] I've found some of those other covers online stamped for other regions.

The whole thing is 16 pages, a roughly even mixture of schematics and stock commercial art illustrations mixed with panels forming a story that I'm willing to bet were drawn by Kurt Schaffenberger. In 1974, Schaffenberger became a focus of attention when DC combined three titles (SUPERMAN'S PAL JIMMY OLSEN, SUPERMAN'S GIRLFRIEND LOIS LANE and SUPERGIRL) starring characters he had drawn, at one time or another, into a single extra-length title SUPERMAN FAMILY. It prompted the obvious question, "If you have three series you were going to cancel for flagging sales, what makes you think that the fans of each (let alone more fans) will pay more to get any one of them?" Well, somebody did because SUPERMAN FAMILY lasted another eight years. After the Three Mile Island incident in the late 1970's, these pro-nuclear energy tracts (which had been common since the 1950's) gave way to pro-computer (and pocket calculator) tracts sponsored by Radio Shack. By then, it became more common for the creative teams to be credited, which is helpful when dealing with artists who aren't quite as instantly recognizable as Schaffenberger.